Rare Disease Reporting Outcomes Questionnaire¶
Collecting reporting outcomes through the Interpretation Portal is crucial for enhancing the knowledge base and allows the constant improvement of the pipeline. These outcomes are automatically integrated into the (CVA)knowledge base, accessible to all GLH users.
When a referral has been reviewed in the Interpretation Browser (or DSS) and a SoF generated (Please see the individual DSS user guides for specific instructions) the case will move into the "Pending Outcomes" tab.
To complete the Reporting Outcomes Questionnaire (ROQ) and close the rare disease referral, users should click on the “Review” button next to the “Download” button in the SoF table.
- The reporting outcomes questionnaire will then be available to populate from a list of drop-down menus.
- The variants displayed in the questionnaire are those contained within the associated version of the SoF. If several versions of a SoF are generated, it is possible to complete a Reporting outcomes questionnaire for each one.
Info
It is only necessary to complete one questionnaire per case, usually this would be against the most recent version of the SoF. If a reporting outcomes questionnaire is completed for a case but then another SoF is generated, the case will move from closed (“Reported”) to “Pending Outcomes” and require a new RoQ to be created.
The reporting outcomes questionnaire is divided into family-level and variant-level questions.
For “negative” reports containing no variants, the questionnaire will only present the family level questions.
Once completed, please click on the “submit” button at the bottom of the page to close the case and move it into the "Reported Cases" tab.
If you need to revise your RoQ, please open it again as described, complete it again, and resubmit. Note that this version will over-ride the previous version, as only one questionnaire can be stored against each SoF version.
An RoQ can be saved as a draft and returned to be completed at another time.
Auto-populate the ROQ¶
This feature allows users to seamlessly fill in certain questions of the ROQ by retrieving previously entered responses during decision-making in Congenica. This process involves extracting the responses from Congenica through the Variant Interpretation Logs (VILs), which are then utilized to pre-fill corresponding sections in the ROQ.
Requirements for this feature to operate:
- Applicable exclusively to SNV with a decision recorded in Congenica.
- Successful extraction of VILs for the respective variants from Congenica, and their availability in the CVA.
Please be aware that in cases where multiple SoF have decisions made against the same variant, this feature will prioritize the latest VIL to auto-populate the questionnaire.
Congenica to ROQ Mapping¶
This PDF provides a detailed guide on mapping questions and answers between Congenica and the Reporting Outcomes Questionnaire (ROQ):
Demo Video¶
Watch the following demonstration video to learn how to use the Auto-populate feature in the Reporting Outcomes Questionnaire:
Family Level Questions¶
Have the results reported here explained the genetic basis of the family’s presenting phenotype(s)?
Do the combined variants between them explain the genetic basis of the presenting phenotype(s) in the referral? This is asking whether the case can be considered fully or partially solved.
Have you done any segregation testing in non-participating family members?
If you have, please enter details in the free text comments box below.Please do NOT include any identifying details in this box. For example, “Proband’s maternal uncle also affected with ataxia and carries the variant in gene X” is acceptable; “Also tested Robert Smith for the variant in gene X” is not acceptable.
Variant Level Questions¶
Did you carry out confirmation of this variant via an alternative test?
Did the test confirm that the variant is present?
Did you include the variant in your report to the clinician?
What ACMG pathogenicity score (1-5) did you assign to this variant?
Please provide PMIDs for papers which you have used to inform your assessment for this variant
Five questions are asked about each individual reported variant. It is not mandatory to enter details of publications used to support the reporting outcome, but if you have used any in the clinical report, please enter them here, they will be added to CVA.
Is evidence for this variant/variant pair sufficient to use it for clinical purposes such as prenatal diagnosis or predictive testing?
Three questions are asked at the level of a variant or pair of compound heterozygous variants. In this one, you should state whether you have reported the variant or variant pair as having sufficient supporting evidence to be used for clinical purposes such as prenatal diagnosis or cascade/predictive testing.
Has the clinical team identified any changes to clinical care which could potentially arise as a result of this variant/variant pair?
Is there any potential clinical outcomes which may have been identified during discussion with the clinical team, e.g. at the results MDT meeting. If this information is not available, please record it as unknown.
Did you report this variant/variant pair as being partially or completely causative of the family's presenting phenotype(s)?
Have you included the particular variant or variant pair in question as directly causative, either partially or completely, to the presenting phenotypes in the referral, in the clinical report,.